Peer review post-mortem: how a flawed aging study was published in Nature

The answer to that question can be found with the gatekeeping mechanisms of the publishing process: the editors of the magazine and peer reviewing. Those peers are fellow specialists who are invited to evaluate the manuscript.

from Pocket
via Did you enjoy this article? Then read the full version from the author’s website.

Advertisements
Peer review post-mortem: how a flawed aging study was published in Nature

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s